Skip to main content

Twitter is the slowest social network, Facebook the fastest

Interesting statistics just came out on AlertSite blog post about performance and response time of various highly trafficked social networks.


Unsurprisingly, Facebook is the fastest, and Twitter is the slowest. Facebook has so much more data to deal with, so much media, and so many more users, that it really is a shame for Twitter with it's 140 character data set to be in this unglorious last place.

After continuous reports about migrating to Cassandra, Twitter still serves their tweets out of MemCaches that sit in front of MySQL. When those caches die, it takes a long time to refill them and the site yet again drops the very familiar Fail Whale.

Perhaps Twitter's infrastructure group could use some new blood to work on scaling and up-time. I am guessing that adding experienced people who scaled Facebook, or other high traffic sites could really help in the long run. The problem is that hiring experienced contributors to work on this pain point may feel threatening to the existing crew who continually tried and ultimately failed to fix Twitter's performance problems. Don't fall into this trap Twitter: people who are having hard time re-engineering current architecture will continue to have a hard time without an influx of fresh energy and new ideas. Consider making the necessary changes, and then perhaps you could pull out of that miserly last place.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Car or Auto Make-Model-Year Database : For Breakfast

Make Model What?If you like me were tasked with loading a database of recent car makes/models/years, you would start by looking on the web and seeing if someone else just has it out there, readily available, hopefully for free, but perhaps for a tiny nominal fee.?If only it was that simple... I looked and looked, and couldn't find anything that would fit the above requirements. So I thought, who would know about US car models better than Kelly Blue Book? So I went on their site, and sure enough they have a javascript file that lists all known to them makes and models of used cars. Since the file is public, I figured it's not really "evil" if I scrape and parse it for my own benefit. Disagree? Have a better source? Then leave a comment.Anyway, to cut the long story short, I'm hoping to save a day or so to someone else who may, like me, be looking for this information. The ruby module shown below retrieves and parses the javascript from KBB site into a Ruby da…

Rails3 and The Inevitable Fragmentation

I remember one of the early talks at the Canada On Rails in 2006 had a slide showing how many books one needs to read to be able to write web applications in Rails, versus Java.Of course Java side had about 10 books: Java SE, Java EE, Hibernate, Struts/Tiles/JSF, WebServices, Ant, Maven, Eclipse, JUnit, etc, etc.The Rails slide proudly showed the now hopelessly outdated "Agile Web Development With Ruby on Rails", 1st edition. Those were the times. Back then, during my work for Blurb.com myself and three other engineers managed to learn ruby, rails and build a fully functional e-commerce site in about 3 months. I was blown away by the productivity gains compared to Java, where months could be spent laying out the project, and creating all necessary infrastructure for builds, deployment, automated testing with or without the database, etc.Fast-forward to 2010. We are on a brink of Rails3 release, and oh boy, has the landscape changed since back then. I would argue that in s…

Why I Like PostgreSQL

Today I gave a short presentation at work about PostgreSQL, and why I much prefer it to MySQL.

PostgreSQL vs MySQL: Eternal Battle
I may be misreading this, but it seems that there is a recent trend within startups to move away from MySQL, probably thanks to folks like Heroku on one side (who use PostgreSQL to the extreme, and help and contribute to it's development), vs folks like Oracle on the other side, tainting the "open source pureness" of MySQL :)

At my work we currently use a mid-sized MySQL 5.1 Percona instance, which is holding up quite well I must admit. Both PostgreSQL and MySQL have definitely converged to cover most features that people want, but my leaning is still towards PostgreSQL. I just agree with it's focus on data integrity, recovery, constraints, extensibility, while some of the early decisions in MySQL's design do not agree with me at all (like truncating long strings, 1/0 instead of booleans, ambiguous group by, etc). I think that data …