Skip to main content

Upgrading to Mac OS-X 10.5 "Leopard"

Last night I upgraded to Leopard. I was a little frightened, because you know, things don't always go as planned. Especially if you consider that I use my MacBook Pro for music production, in addition to software development in two languages (java and ruby).

So how did it go?

I opted for an "Upgrade" option because the thought of re-installing 200Gb of Native Instruments plug-ins and sample libraries was not very appealing as you might imagine. NI web site suggested not to upgrade until they verify all applications by December, but I decided to bite the bullet and go for it anyway. Someone's gotta do it :)

So far - I must admit, I haven't seen a single hitch. Upgrade took about an hour (even though Installer at first reported it will take 4!!), and things seem to be running smoothly.

Here's a list of applications I have verified to work on my system:
  • Eclipse IDE, Aptana IDE, IntelliJ IDEA (7.0.1 and 6.0.5), TextMate
  • Fetch, PostgreSQL, Resin 3
  • ruby 1.8.6 (my previous installation in /usr/local/ruby-1.8.6), ruby 1.8.6 (installed with Leopard in /usr/bin/ruby)
  • Photoshop CS, Acrobat Reader, Omni Graffle, MS Office 2004
  • Audium, Twitterific, iChat
  • Firefox, Safari (obviously), Opera
  • QuickTime, iPhoto, iPhotoLibrary, AddresBook, Toast 8
  • Logic Pro 7, Live Lite 6, Reason 3.0.5
  • Native Instruments Komplete 4 (Kontakt, Reaktor, Absynth, FM8)
My hardware:
  • MacBook Pro (Intel) 2.4Ghz with 2Gb of RAM

I'll add more to the list as I am going through and discovering things, but so far I am pretty pleased with how smooth this upgrade was.

What was your experience - especially if you did an upgrade?

Update, November 10th 2007

I've been using Leopard since the upgrade, everything is running smoothly, even my Native Instruments and Waves plugins. All of my Logic projects opened up as they did before. Yay!

I love the Stacks feature, which actually is a really nice way to unclutter your Desktop. I've been long waiting for a clean way to access folders efficiently from the Dock, and this totally hits the bill. I drag folders containing other folders, and it turns into a nice little menu.

Spaces seems cool, but I never remember to use it. Maybe once I get used to it...

Comments

David said…
Hey there K,

David Earl here. This warms my heart. I was debating whether to upgrade or not, and it seems from your post that this may be a good plan. I already updated my MB Pro, now I'm eyeing my G5 dual 2.3 and the prospect of having Leopard on it is almost too much!
Bunk Bed Gal said…
I've been afraid to upgrade out of fear that I'll totally screw up my computer, which would be tragic, since I have my entire business set up on it.

I have a Mac Book and a G5, so I'll do the upgrade on the Mac Book first, and if it doesn't totally crash, I'll tackle the G5.

Thanks for your reassurance. :)

Lisa
Bunk Beds & Loft Beds Galore

Popular posts from this blog

Car or Auto Make-Model-Year Database : For Breakfast

Make Model What?If you like me were tasked with loading a database of recent car makes/models/years, you would start by looking on the web and seeing if someone else just has it out there, readily available, hopefully for free, but perhaps for a tiny nominal fee.?If only it was that simple... I looked and looked, and couldn't find anything that would fit the above requirements. So I thought, who would know about US car models better than Kelly Blue Book? So I went on their site, and sure enough they have a javascript file that lists all known to them makes and models of used cars. Since the file is public, I figured it's not really "evil" if I scrape and parse it for my own benefit. Disagree? Have a better source? Then leave a comment.Anyway, to cut the long story short, I'm hoping to save a day or so to someone else who may, like me, be looking for this information. The ruby module shown below retrieves and parses the javascript from KBB site into a Ruby da…

Why I Like PostgreSQL

Today I gave a short presentation at work about PostgreSQL, and why I much prefer it to MySQL.

PostgreSQL vs MySQL: Eternal Battle
I may be misreading this, but it seems that there is a recent trend within startups to move away from MySQL, probably thanks to folks like Heroku on one side (who use PostgreSQL to the extreme, and help and contribute to it's development), vs folks like Oracle on the other side, tainting the "open source pureness" of MySQL :)

At my work we currently use a mid-sized MySQL 5.1 Percona instance, which is holding up quite well I must admit. Both PostgreSQL and MySQL have definitely converged to cover most features that people want, but my leaning is still towards PostgreSQL. I just agree with it's focus on data integrity, recovery, constraints, extensibility, while some of the early decisions in MySQL's design do not agree with me at all (like truncating long strings, 1/0 instead of booleans, ambiguous group by, etc). I think that data …

On Ruby on Rails with PostgreSQL, and Acts as Paranoid

Back a few years ago I was researching differences between PostgreSQL and MySQL databases, and chose PostgreSQL because at the time it supported foreign key constraints and many other fantastic SQL extensions that make developer's life a lot easier. Today I am sure MySQL is just as functional as PostgreSQL, and it does appear to be a more popular choice as the Rails DB than MySQL. I still prefer PostgreSQL, it just feels more natural to me coming out of Oracle background, so I am probably biased (who isn't?) Anyway, in the last year and a half or so, I've been writing Rails apps that use PG-based databases and found a few random tricks I'd love to share here. Opinions differ here, but just like accountants like the ancient double entry accounting system, I personally prefer a double validation system - where Rails validates my objects before/after updates, but the database double checks this using proper constraints. Rail's validation system is very robust and ext…